Express Edition is supported.Ĭollation must be case-sensitive (CS) and accent-sensitive (AS) (example: Latin1_General_CS_AS). Express Edition is supported.Ģ014 (MSSQL Server 12.0) with bundled Microsoft JDBC driver. Express Edition is supported.Ģ016 (MSSQL Server 13.0) with bundled Microsoft JDBC driver. Express Edition is supported.Ģ017 (MSSQL Server 14.0) with bundled Microsoft JDBC driver. Express Edition is supported.Ģ019 (MSSQL Server 15.0) with bundled Microsoft JDBC driver. We recommend using the critical patch update (CPU) releases.Ģ022 (MSSQL 16.0) with bundled Microsoft JDBC driver. SonarQube is able to analyze any kind of Java source files regardless of the version of Java they comply with. The SonarQube server requires Java version 17 and the SonarQube scanners require Java version 11 or 17. 16GB of RAM For additional requirements and recommendations relating to database and Elasticsearch, see Hardware recommendations.8 cores, to allow the main SonarQube platform to run with multiple compute engine workers.A starting configuration should include at least: At the enterprise level, monitoring your SonarQube instance is essential and should guide further hardware upgrades as your instance grows. Read and write hard drive performance will therefore have a big impact on the overall SonarQube server performance.įor large teams or enterprise-scale installations of SonarQube, additional hardware is required. Most importantly, the "data" folder houses the Elasticsearch indices on which a huge amount of I/O will be done when the server is up and running. SonarQube must be installed on hard drives that have excellent read & write performance.The amount of disk space you need will depend on how much code you analyze with SonarQube.If you are installing an instance for a large team or an enterprise, please consider the additional recommendations below. A small-scale (individual or small team) instance of the SonarQube server requires at least 2GB of RAM to run efficiently and 1GB of free RAM for the OS.To summarize, are more prevalent technical constraints, and re-emphasized demands upon open-source Java authors, in this shift to further allow & encourage Windows based Java development.You must be able to install Java (Oracle JRE or OpenJDK) on the machine where you plan to run SonarQube. I encourage us to reflect on this as a mini Eternal September event, of Microsoft extending the reach of their community into something that used to be a little more deliberate that's maybe putting it a little strongly, but I think we can recognize the parallel. It increases a library maintainer's burden, supporting this new class of usually-not-that-expert users. OpenJDK of course is cross platform & already supports Windows, but the sign that this is a proper & well supported thing in Windows will quite likely amplify Windows user's expectations that all the libraries & tools they run across are going to be catered to them & their experience. I want to at least put down some words, somewhere, to remark that Windows support is constraining & limiting. But there really is a downside to this all too, and it goes unremarked. I'm fine with the general attitude of harmony and oh yay, a bigger tent for everyone, it doesn't bother me, and platform flexibility has it's upsides. Microsoft extending their Microsoftisms into every software platform is a frustrating limitation to keep facing. If only there weren't some weird platform-I-don't-want-anyways's limitations gumming thing up. Npm too would be much easier to work with if it could have had symlinks. I want to believe it's a good thing, but having to support a platform that doesn't support good ole symlinks is incredibly aggravating.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |